![]() Of erasing a file), for a pile of notes, and for many other things. (directories on a disk), for a waste basket (the bit bucket, or the act They had iconsįor filing cabinets (disk drives in the computer system), for folders Screens look a little like the desks in a typical office. Object-oriented interfaces in the late 1970s and early 1980s made the Way these icons were placed on the screens of the first experimental Kind or another, all represented by icons - on the computer screen. Such as "XCOPY C:\BIN\FOO *.* /S A:" onto a blank screen, the user ofĪn object-oriented interface merely deals with things - objects of one Or dragging it to another icon, for example. Selecting an icon and doing something with it - double-clicking on it Onto the screen, the user instructs the computer to do any task by Objects that perform actions - actions that are, in most cases,Īnalogous to what happens in "real life." Instead of typing commands "object-oriented" interface, because it allows the user to manipulate It is easier to describe such a system as an Not have to use icons and windows, but that is how most of them haveĭeveloped. (That version disappeared from the marketplace in an Icon-and-windows interface for the exciting new 520ST, managed toĬonvince Digital Research to leave the Atari version of GEM unsullied,Īnd so the ST came to life with a GUI of its own, vaguely similar to the But the new owners of Atari Computer, casting about for an ![]() That GEM was too much like Windows, and so Digital Research changed Legal dispute between Digital Research and Microsoft, which was thenĭeveloping its own graphical system called Windows. Of its power and many of its features before it came to market, after a This PC system, the Graphics Environment Manager, was stripped of much Research as almost a sideline in its efforts to create a GUI for PCs. The ST's graphical environment was designed by Digital yes, it's pronounced "gooey" and not "Gee You Eye" - followed the Personal computers had even heard of icons and windows. Graphical user interface long before most users of IBM-compatible We like to point out withĬonsiderable pride that the ST arrived on our desks with a built-in You can even run NeoDesk 4Ĭomfortably on a 1-megabyte ST, although it will run more quickly and Way Ataris have always operated, NeoDesk 4 occupies only as much memoryĪs you want to yield over to the desktop. Perform some functions that Windows 3.1 and the Mac cannot ordinarilyĪnd, almost as a tribute to the lean and efficient Intuitive than either of its popular counterparts. But inĬreating NeoDesk 4, Gribnif did not imitate Windows or fashion an Atari Organizing and managing programs by groups.Ĭhanges everything, and corrects an imbalance between the premiereĭesktop environment for the Atari and Microsoft's Windows. NeoDesk 3 did not have two other features that have made the bestĭesktops on PCs so attractive - a modern 3D look and feel, and a way of But NeoDesk 3's own operations -Ĭopying, deleting and formatting, for example - did not multitask. System, NeoDesk 3 was able to launch a new application while a currently Gribnif's multitasking replacement for part of the Atari operating In the most basic way as long as the computer was running Geneva, Gribnif's alternative desktop, already supported multitasking, but only Introduction of Gribnif Software's NeoDesk 4, users of the Atari ST, TTĪnd Falcon were left on the sidelines of the revolution in multitaskingĭesktops for personal computers. INTRODUCTION Power, grace and style on an Atari
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |